The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of the press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments.
Freedom of Religion
Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the “separation of church and state.” However, some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of “blue laws” is not prohibited. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person’s practice of their religion.
Freedom of Speech / Freedom of the Press
The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion, and such statements.
A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.
Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.
Right to Assemble / Right to Petition
The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual’s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.
The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.
More info on Seattle WA Fire Department And The Seattle Police Department Try To Violate Citizens Rights
Trump'd (Up) or Truth: Will DOJ & Supreme Court Leave Postmaster General as Fall Guy - Asks Robert Peterson & Fields Associates
Last year, civil rights lobbyist Cary Peterson ... New Jersey-- a legal mail item that was [apparently] a copy of the Justice Department's reply petition and a trial court transcript excerpt ...
Duo: CN court action violates constitution
Nash, in which the court determined Freedmen — descendants of Black slaves of Cherokees — have full rights as citizens, based on the Treaty of 1866. However, District 3 Tribal Councilor Wes Nofire and ...
Spokane police halt arrests for simple drug possession after Washington Supreme Court ruling
The Spokane Police Department can no longer make arrests for simple possession of drugs after a bombshell ruling this week from the Washington State Supreme Court that effectively decriminalized ...
Police rampage targets striking railway workers in Myanmar
The police rampage ... different government departments and banks’ employees are participating in CDM together.” The railway strike has received support from ordinary citizens who have placed ...
WA Rep: Police tactics bill appeases ‘political group’ at expense of safety
A new bill seeks to make many changes to police tactics and use of force in Washington state ... is they reference the riots in Seattle and Portland, and my understanding — I’m doing the ...
Kent police promises new policies and data in wake of anonymous campaign
The letter also said that the Kent Police Department lacks long-awaited policies requiring de-escalation training for officers (as required by Initiative 940 which Washington State voters approved ...
Seattle Fire Employee Arrested After Councilmember Threats
but in January Councilmember Kshama Sawant said she had received threats from an email address that appeared to belong to Seattle Fire Department employee. Police said there was an initial ...
Big Business Goes Up Against Democracy in Seattle
The recall advocates intend to fire ... of police violence. Key organizations, including the local United Food and Commercial Workers Union, called for her resignation. The Seattle Human Rights ...
Bushfire burns Perth Hills homes while Australian city is on lockdown
Residents fleeing the fire told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation they're not sure what the evacuation rules are during COVID-19 restrictions. Details: Police Commissioner Chris Dawson, who is ...
Police officer who killed Phoenix man won't face charges
PHOENIX (AP) — Prosecutors have declined to file criminal charges against a Phoenix police officer who fatally shot a man in the back eight months ago at an apartment complex where a neighbor ...
Activists: Next Columbus police chief must be an outsider
He was chosen over Perry Tarrant, a former assistant police chief in Seattle, who is Black. At the time, Ginther said Quinlan must address racism within the department’s ranks, including further ...
Alaska Man Admits Setting Fire at Seattle Police Precinct
He also was seen on the 11-minute video speaking with black-clad participants who used a crowbar and other means to try to bar ... pay restitution to the Seattle Police Department for damage ...