The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of the press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments.
Freedom of Religion
Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the “separation of church and state.” However, some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of “blue laws” is not prohibited. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person’s practice of their religion.
Freedom of Speech / Freedom of the Press
The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion, and such statements.
A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.
Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.
Right to Assemble / Right to Petition
The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual’s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.
The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment
More info on Seattle WA Fire Department And The Seattle Police Department Try To Violate Citizens Rights
Seattle WA Fire Department And The Seattle Police Department Try To Violate Citizens Rights - BingNews Search results
-
Seattle fire crews responding to commercial fire in Georgetown neighborhood
A car collided with a commercial building, causing a two-alarm fire in Seattle's Georgetown neighborhood on Wednesday morning.The Seattle Fire Department tweeted crews were responding to the site of ...
-
Abortion ruling prompts variety of reactions from states
The U.S. Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that had provided a constitutional right to abortion.
-
Fire crews put out building fire on Olive Way in Seattle Monday morning
Firefighters responded Monday morning to a building fire in downtown Seattle. Caption: Fire crews put out building fire on Olive Way in Seattle Monday morning ...
-
Seattle police officers won’t march in Pride Parade, frustrated chief says
The decision comes after Police Chief Adrian Diaz expressed frustration over Seattle Pride's decision to bar uniformed officers from marching.
-
Firearm Tech – Are Smart Guns Even Realistic?
The general idea is to have a gun that will not fire unless authenticated and authorized ... Take a look at the Colt 1911 cutaway as it fires and try to figure out where you would put electronics ...
-
Seattle police, Pride organizers clash over banning officers at parade
The Seattle Police Department published a letter decrying the exclusion of any and all uniformed law enforcement personnel from the city's annual Pride Parade.
-
Police and Seattle Fire respond to 12th Ave after man injured in reported apartment building stabbing
A man was taken to the hospital in stable condition after a Wednesday night stabbing. Police and Seattle Fire were called to 12th and Marion just after 10 PM where the reported stabbing victim was ...
-
Seattle police will not be marching in Seattle Pride Parade
Seattle Pride said officers can march, but they aren't allowed to wear their uniforms, law enforcement logos or insignias.
-
Police investigate deadly shooting at encampment in Seattle
SEATTLE - Police are investigating a deadly shooting at an encampment overnight in Seattle’s Delridge neighborhood. At about 12:20 a.m. Monday, a person called 911 to report someone had been shot ...
-
Complaints against former Seattle police chief still pending
Three misconduct complaints against former Seattle police Chief Carmen Best from the summer of 2020 went unaddressed and are still pending. Mayor Bruce Harrell’s office this year sent the cases to an ...
-
The Lawless Arm of the Law
Seattle’s pre-trials were ... Taking annual police-department reports for 1929 from New York, Detroit, Washington, Baltimore, Los Angeles, St. Louis, and Denver, I eliminated traffic citations ...
-
Political News
Wade, giving individual states full discretion on the issue of abortion rights in the United States. Texas state Sen. Bryan Hughes, a Republican who authored the state's fetal heartbeat bill ...