The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. It prohibits any laws that establish a national religion, impede the free exercise of religion, abridge the freedom of speech, infringe upon the freedom of the press, interfere with the right to peaceably assemble, or prohibit citizens from petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments.
Freedom of Religion
Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the “separation of church and state.” However, some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of “blue laws” is not prohibited. The Free Exercise Clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person’s practice of their religion.
Freedom of Speech / Freedom of the Press
The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. Generally, a person cannot be held liable, either criminally or civilly for anything written or spoken about a person or topic, so long as it is truthful or based on an honest opinion, and such statements.
A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech and obscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.
Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.
Right to Assemble / Right to Petition
The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual’s current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with First Amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.
The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.
More info on Seattle WA Fire Department And The Seattle Police Department Try To Violate Citizens Rights
Turtle power, ditching Dixie, Ph.D. at age 89: News from around our 50 states
Denver: An appeals court panel on Wednesday reinstated a lawsuit filed by Republican lawmakers and a Colorado gun rights ... Resources Police spokesperson Lauren Moses said her department is ...
Ann Coulter's Felony Voter Fraud Crimes: The Complete Story
Perhaps two felonies plus a misdemeanor, according to a report from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department. Despite a friendly friend ... when her FBI friend would try to save her. For someone who ...
Mister Rogers, civics education, fishy promotion: News from around our 50 states
The police department, which employs about 36,000 officers and 19,000 civilian employees, reported an 84% vaccination rate as of Sunday morning, while roughly 2 in 10 of the fire department’s ...
Police case gave Supreme Court a chance to protect your rights to record cops. It whiffed.
Evans, the Supreme Court managed to set back both the public’s right to record police and efforts to hold police accountable for violating citizens' constitutional rights. The decision in this ...
Justice Department sues Texas over new voting law
The Justice Department is suing ... errors or omissions," violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act. "The State of Texas's history of official voting-related discrimination ...
Firearm Tech – Are Smart Guns Even Realistic?
The general idea is to have a gun that will not fire unless authenticated and authorized ... Take a look at the Colt 1911 cutaway as it fires and try to figure out where you would put electronics ...
Supreme Court questions controversial Texas abortion law
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen at dusk in Washington, Oct. 22, 2021. The Supreme Court is taking up challenges to a Texas law that has virtually ended abortion in the nation’s second largest ...
Beggars’ Night, ‘Stranger’ hotel stays, haunted history: News from around our 50 states
Highway crosses over thousands of graves in Rhode Island, painting of enslaved child that spooked visitors back in Yale museum, and more ...
Judge won't stop vaccine mandate for NYC cops, other workers
As of Tuesday, 73% of police department personnel had gotten at least one vaccine dose, Police Commissioner Dermot Shea told WPIX-TV on Wednesday. The fire department reported a vaccination rate ...
Covid live: Latvia closes schools and venues as curfew introduced; UK situation ‘concerning’, says expert
Sgt Randy Huserik and all other officers with the Seattle police department who have been ... representatives saying that the mandates violate their rights. In Chicago, the issue has even led ...
Supreme Court shields police accused of excessive force under qualified immunity
Both cases had rulings stating the officers were entitled to qualified immunity, a legal doctrine preventing government officials from being sued for violations of citizens' rights ... is necessary ...